Keywords
Cotton
Eco-Discharge Printing
Natural Dyes
How to Cite
Abstract
The global fashion industry is under increasing scrutiny for its environmental footprint, particularly due to the toxic chemicals and waste generated during textile processing. Discharge printing, widely employed for intricate textile designs, often involves hazardous chemicals like formaldehyde sulfoxylate, which pose significant environmental and health risks. The study objective is to develop an environmentally friendly enzyme discharge printing process and assess its environmental impact that aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals. Specifically, the study explores the use of acid cellulase enzymes for discharge printing on natural dyed fabrics, minimizing harmful chemical use while maintaining design quality and aesthetic appeal. The methodology integrates experimental trials of enzyme formulations varying pH, time, temperature, and enzyme concentration on natural dyed cotton fabric. Technical evaluation of this enzyme-assisted discharge printing method was done by spectrophotometer analysis, tensile strength testing, and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) in wastewater, demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving desired aesthetic effects, preserving fabric integrity, and supporting eco-friendly textile production compared to conventional discharge printing methods. Results indicate that enzyme-assisted processes achieve effective colour removal with a tone-on-tone effect on natural dyes, except indigo, while reducing chemical usage, demonstrating compatibility with natural dyes and enhanced biodegradability. This approach not only reduces environmental hazards but also supports circular fashion practices by promoting safer, sustainable alternatives. The study concludes that enzyme discharge printing has the potential to revolutionize sustainable textile production, offering a viable pathway for businesses to adopt commerce with conscience. It advocates for the integration of such innovations into fashion supply chains, fostering a balance between profitability and environmental stewardship.
References
1. Chattopadhyay, S. N., and S. K. Sanyal. 2001. “Enzyme Treatment on Jute – Effect of Resin Treatment.” Colourage 48: 20.
2. Dhurai, Karthikeyan K., and Bharathi Dhurai. 2012. “New Method of Discharge Printing on Cotton Fabrics Using Enzymes.” Fibre2Fashion, March 26. https://www.fibre2fashion.com/industry-article/6139/new-method-of-discharge-printing-on-cotton-fabrics-using-enzymes.
3. Haggag, K., Asmaa Ragheb, I. El-Thalouth, S. Nassar, and Hanan El-Sayed. 2013. “A Review Article on Enzymes and Their Role in Resist and Discharge Printing Styles.” Life Science Journal 10: 1646–1654.
4. Heine, E., and H. Hoecker. 2001. “Smart Fibres, Fabrics and Clothing.” In Smart Fibres, Fabrics and Clothing, edited by Xiaoming Tao, 254. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
5. Jahan, Shahnaz. 2020. “Functional Properties of Natural Dyed Textiles.” Academia.edu, January. https://www.academia.edu/70572460/Functional_Properties_of_Natural_Dyed_Textiles.
6. Karthikeyan, K., and Bharathi Dhurai. 2011. “New Method of Discharge Printing on Cotton Fabrics Using Horseradish Peroxidase.” Autex Research Journal 11 (2): 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/aut-2011-110206.
7. Kumar, A., and A. K. R. Chowdhury. 2018. “Eco-Friendly Dyes and Dyeing.” Advanced Materials and Technologies for Environmental Sciences 2 (1): 145–176.
8. Samanta, Ashis Kumar. 2024. “Fundamentals of Natural Dyeing of Textiles: Pros and Cons.” Caluniv, December. https://www.academia.edu/47123015/Fundamentals_of_Natural_Dyeing_of_Textiles_Pros_and_Cons?email_work_card=view-paper.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 JASSSR