Keywords
Siva
Interrelationship of Art
Iconography
Art
Aesthetics
Art History
Religion
Sacred
How to Cite
Abstract
The paper explores the deep interconnection among various Indian art forms through the lens of Śiva Natesa (Natarāja) imagery, a powerful symbol of cosmic rhythm, aesthetics, and metaphysical philosophy. Drawing upon classical texts such as the Nāṭyaśāstra, Vāyu Purāṇa, and Liṅgamahāpurāṇa, as well as modern scholarship by Coomaraswamy, Vatsyayan, and Kramrisch, the study examines Śiva’s dual role as Natesa, the cosmic dancer, and Vinādhara, the master of music. By analyzing sculptural representations from the Maitraka, Chola, Gupta, and Bhanja dynasties, the work demonstrates how music, dance, drama, and architecture were conceived not as isolated practices, but as unified expressions of rasa and spiritual transcendence. The article situates Indian aesthetics within a multi-sensory framework of drishya (visual), śravya (aural), and drishya-śravya (integrated) and interprets Śiva's dance as a metaphor for creation, dissolution, and liberation. Ultimately, it argues that Śiva Natesa imagery not only synthesizes diverse artistic streams but also embodies the philosophical and emotional depth of Indic aesthetic experience.
References
1. Boner, Alice. 1991. Principles of Composition in Hindu Sculpture: Cave Temple Period. London: Kegan Paul.
2. Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. 2008. Introduction to Indian Art. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
3. Iyer, Alessandra. 2000. “Śiva’s Dance: Iconography and Dance Practice in South and Southeast Asia.” Music in Art 25 (1/2): 25–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41818357.
4. Kaimal, Padma. 1999. “Shiva Nataraja: Shifting Meanings of an Icon.” The Art Bulletin 81 (3): 390–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/3051349.
5. Knapp, Bettina L. 1978. “The Dance of Siva: Malraux, Motion and Multiplicity.” Twentieth Century Literature 24 (3): 358–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/441277.
6. Kramrisch, Stella. 1981. Manifestations of Śiva. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art.
7. Long, J. Bruce. 1971. “Śiva as Promulgator of Traditional Learning and Patron Deity of the Fine Arts.” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 52 (1/4): 67–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41688714.
8. Meister, Michael W. 1986. “Regional Variations in Mātṛkā Conventions.” Artibus Asiae 47 (3/4): 233–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/3249973.
9. Pandey, K. C. 1965. “A Bird’s-Eye View of Indian Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 24 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/428248.
10. Srinivasan, Sharada. 2004. “Shiva as ‘Cosmic Dancer’: On Pallava Origins for the Nataraja Bronze.” World Archaeology 36 (3): 432–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128341.
11. Sivaramamurti, C. 1994. Nataraja in Art, Thought and Literature. New Delhi: National Museum of India.
12. Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1965. Classical Indian Dance in Literature and the Arts. New Delhi: Sangeet Natak Akademi.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 JASSSR