Kalighat Painting: A Portrait and Critique of 19th-Century Kolkata Society
PDF
XML

Keywords

Colonial India
Babu
Bhadrolok
Painting
Critics
Kalighat

How to Cite

Kalighat Painting: A Portrait and Critique of 19th-Century Kolkata Society. (2025). Journal of Asiatic Society for Social Science Research, 7(1), 18-26. https://asssr.in/index.php/jasssr/article/view/110

Abstract

Kalighat painting, emerging in 19th-century Kolkata, offers a vivid artistic portrayal and critique of contemporary society. Originating in the vicinity of the Kalighat temple, these paintings were created by patuas (scroll painters) who adapted traditional scroll painting techniques to single-sheet depictions, catering to the growing urban market. Characterized by bold lines, vibrant colors, and minimal background details, Kalighat paintings evolved from religious themes to a broader social commentary, reflecting the dynamic transformations of colonial Kolkata.  These artworks served as a visual medium to critique social customs, hypocrisy, and moral decadence. While initially focusing on Hindu deities and mythological tales, Kalighat painters gradually turned their attention to the emerging Bengali middle class (bhadralok), colonial administrators, and everyday urban life. They depicted satirical narratives of corruption, gender roles, and social pretensions, often portraying moneylenders, profligate babus, and courtesans in exaggerated and ironic forms. The rise of a consumer culture, fueled by colonial modernity, was also reflected in their depictions of changing attire, material aspirations, and interactions between Indians and Europeans. Beyond mere satire, Kalighat paintings encapsulated anxieties surrounding socio-economic changes, the erosion of traditional values, and the impact of Western influence. The hybridization of Indian and Western artistic techniques mirrored these cultural negotiations. Despite being dismissed as folk art in the colonial period, Kalighat paintings have gained recognition as a powerful archive of 19th-century Bengali society, bridging the gap between popular art and political critique. This paper explores how Kalighat painting functioned as both a portrait and a critique of 19th-century Kolkata society. By analyzing its themes, techniques, and socio-political context, it argues that these artworks were not merely decorative but served as visual commentaries on a rapidly transforming urban landscape, offering a grassroots perspective on colonial modernity.

 

DOI: 10.46700/asssr/2025/v7/i1/133

PDF
XML

References

1. Ahuja, Naman P. 2013. “Kalighat Paintings: Satirical Art for the Masses.” Marg: A Magazine of the Arts 64 (4).

Editorship by Marg under the auspices of the Marg Foundation in Mumbai.

2. Archer, W. G. 1971. Kalighat Paintings: A Catalogue and Introduction. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

3. Archer, W. G. 1972. “Kalighat Paintings: A Study in Style and Social Comment.” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 120 (5192).

4. Archer, W. G. 1962. “Bazaar Paintings of Calcutta.” Marg 15 (2).

5. Ghosh, Swati (Roy Chowdhury). 2009. “Kalighat Paintings: A Reinterpretation.” Journal of Art and Art History 21 (3).

6. Guha-Thakurta, Tapati. 1992. The Making of a New ‘Indian’ Art: Artists, Aesthetics, and Nationalism in Bengal, c. 1850–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

7. Jain, Jyotindra. 1999. Kalighat Painting: Images from a Changing World. Ahmedabad: Mapin Publishing.

8. Patua, Kalam. 2011. Kalam Patua: Kalighat Today. New Delhi: Art Alive Gallery.

9. Sen, Uditi. 2008. “Painting Scandals: Kalighat Painters and the Visual Culture of Colonial Bengal.” Modern Asian Studies 42 (5): 895–920.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Abir Sarkar (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.