Understanding Intersectionality: A Framework for Addressing Social Inequalities
PDF
XML

Keywords

Intersectionality
Discrimination
Social Inequalities
Lives of Women
Minorities
Marginalization

How to Cite

Understanding Intersectionality: A Framework for Addressing Social Inequalities. (2023). Journal of Asiatic Society for Social Science Research, 5(2), 15-30. https://asssr.in/index.php/jasssr/article/view/87

Abstract

Intersectionality, a concept first articulated by Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989, is a crucial framework for understanding and addressing the complex ways in which various social identities—such as gender, race, caste, class, sexuality, and disability—interact to generate unique experiences of oppression, privilege, and marginalization. This paper discusses intersectionality's importance in the Indian context, theoretical underpinnings, and conceptual framework. Furthermore, the paper also examines different perspectives and assesses the impact of intersectionality on individuals and communities experiencing compounded discrimination. In the concluding part, this paper highlights that intersectionality goes beyond theoretical concepts and acts as a practical instrument for fostering more inclusive and fair societies, which is not only a national objective but also part of the Sustainable Development Goals (2030). Furthermore, the author of this paper believes that understanding the various dimensions of intersectionality can offer a framework for policymakers to confront deep-seated inequalities and advance social justice in diverse contexts, especially in countries like India where social hierarchies are firmly established. And, by considering multiple identities and experiences concurrently, policies and interventions can be better tailored to meet the needs of those most affected by overlapping forms of discrimination.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46700/asssr/2023/v5/i2/2023120502002

PDF
XML

References

1. Ahmed, S. On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.

2. Ahmed, L. Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.

3. Bastia, T., K. Datta, K. Hujo, N. Piper, and M. Walsham. “Reflections on Intersectionality: A Journey through the Worlds of Migration Research, Policy, and Advocacy.” Gender, Place & Culture 30, no. 3 (2022): 460–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2126826.

4. Bauer, G. R., S. M. Churchill, M. Mahendran, C. Walwyn, D. Lizotte, and A. A. Villa-Rueda. “Intersectionality in Quantitative Research: A Systematic Review of Its Emergence and Applications of Theory and Methods.” SSM - Population Health 14 (2021): 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798.

5. Bowleg, L. “When Black + Lesbian + Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research.” Sex Roles 59, no. 5–6 (2008): 312–325.

6. Cole, E. R. “Intersectionality and Research in Psychology.” American Psychologist 64, no. 3 (2009): 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564.

7. Collins, P. H. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2000.

8. Crenshaw, K. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989, no. 1 (1989): 139–167.

9. Crenshaw, K. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43, no. 6 (1991): 1241–1299.

10. De, D. “Impact of Development-Induced Displacement on the Tribal Community, with Special Reference to the Women in Odisha.” ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement 4, no. 2 (2020): 302–320. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348140641.

11. Dinkar, S., and A. Kamble. “Caste, Gender, and Pedagogy: Perception of Dalit Students in Rural India.” International Journal of Advanced Research 10, no. 1 (2022): 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/15131.

12. Fraser, E. The Dalits of India: Education and Development. E-International Relations, 2010. https://www.e-ir.info/2010/06/23/the-dalits-of-india-education-and-development/#google_vignette.

13. Pal, G. C. Dalits with Disabilities: The Neglected Dimension of Social Exclusion. Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, Working Paper Series, 2010.

14. Gopal, S. “Intersectionality and Indian Feminism.” Feminist Studies 42, no. 3 (2016): 392–413. Harishma, K. H., and P. A. Khamarunnisa. “The Politics of Representing Dalit Women: A Study of the Newspaper Khabar Lahariya and the Documentary Writing with Fire.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 24, no. 7 (2022): 1–4. https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3016&context=jiws.

15. Help Local India. “Women Statistics and Data 2021: Status, Literacy, Safety and More.” Help Local India, 2021. https://helplocal.in/blog/women-stats-data-india/.

16. Human Rights Watch. Caste Discrimination: A Global Concern. Report by Human Rights Watch for the United Nations World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance. Durban, South Africa: Human Rights Watch, 2001.

17. International Dalit Solidarity Network. “Dalit Women.” https://idsn.org/key-issues/dalit-women/.

18. Kadieswaran, S. “Navigating Exile: The Struggles of LGBTQ Refugees.” Manupatra, 2024. https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Navigating-Exile-The-Struggles-of-LGBTQ-Refugees.

19. Kafer, A. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.

20. Kelly, C., D. Kasperavicius, D. Duncan, et al. “‘Doing’ or ‘Using’ Intersectionality? Opportunities and Challenges in Incorporating Intersectionality into Knowledge Translation Theory and Practice.” International Journal Equity Health 20 (2021): 187, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01509-z.

21. Kumari, R. “Women’s Participation in Politics in India: Achieving Genuine Democracy.” Hanns Seidel Stiftung 90 (2013): 25–30.

22. Mosse, D. “Caste and Development: Contemporary Perspectives on a Structure of Discrimination and Advantage.” World Development 110, no. 1 (2018): 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.003.

23. Nash, J. C. “Re-thinking Intersectionality.” Feminist Review 89, no. 1 (2008): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4.

24. Paik, S. “Chhadi Lage Chham Chham, Vidya Yeyi Gham Gham (The Harder the Stick Beats, the Faster the Flow of Knowledge): Dalit Women’s Struggle for Education.” Indian Journal of Gender Studies 16, no. 2 (2009): 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150901600202.

25. Patil, A. “Using the Frameworks of Feminist Disability Studies and Nation-State: A Study of the Present Context of the Scheduled Caste Rural Women with Disabilities in India—A Review.” TISS Journal of Disability Studies and Research 3, no. 2 (2023): 71–103.

26. Rege, S. “Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of ‘Difference’ and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position.” Economic and Political Weekly 33, no. 44 (1998): WS39–WS46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4407323.

27. Sabharwal, S. N., and W. Sonalkar. “Dalit Women in India: At the Crossroads of Gender, Class, and Caste.” Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 8, no. 1 (2015): 44–73. https://www.theglobaljusticenetwork.org/index.php/gjn/article/view/54.

28. Saxena, S., and A. Srivastava. “Political Participation of Women in India.” International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research 6, no. 2 (2024): 1–10. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/2/16339.pdf.

29. Shaw, L. R., F. Chan, and B. T. McMahon. “Intersectionality and Disability Harassment: The Interactive Effects of Disability, Race, Age, and Gender.” Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 55, no. 2 (2012): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355211431167.

30. Sundar, N. “Tribal Women and Development: An Intersectional Perspective.” Development and Change 36, no. 4 (2005): 743–772.

31. Tan, S. E., and K. Kuschminder. “Migrant Experiences of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence: A Critical Interpretative Synthesis.” Globalization & Health 18 (2022): 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00860-2.

32. United Nations. Fact Sheet: Violence Against Women and Girls with Disabilities. 57th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women, 2013.

33. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw57/side_events/Fact%20sheet%20%20VAWG

34. %20with%20disabilities%20FINAL%20.pdf.

35. United Nations. “The Dalit: Born into a Life of Discrimination and Stigma.” 2021.

36. https://www.ohchr.org/en/stories/2021/04/dalit-born-life-discrimination-and-stigma.

37. Weldon, S. L. “The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender.” Politics & Gender 2, no. 2 (2006): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06231040.

38. Wijetunge, M. “Muslim Women in India: A Double Burden?” Gender in Geopolitics Institute, 2023. https://igg-geo.org/?p=18370&lang=en.

39. “Social Justice Groups Forget Dalit Women with Disabilities—And It’s Not Just Oversight.” The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/news/social-justice-groups-forget-dalit-women-with-disabilities-and-its-not-just-oversight.

40. “India Census 2011.” Census 2011. https://www.census2011.co.in/#google_vignette.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 JASSSR

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.