Declining Rural Female Work Participation Rate: Countering a Positivist Reductionist Rationale
PDF
XML

Keywords

Female Workers
Declining Female WPR
Female Unemployment
Feminisation
De-Feminisation

How to Cite

Declining Rural Female Work Participation Rate: Countering a Positivist Reductionist Rationale. (2021). Journal of Asiatic Society for Social Science Research, 3(1), 48-65. https://asssr.in/index.php/jasssr/article/view/51

Abstract

Declining female work participation rate (WPR) has been long ignored by the researchers in post-independence period and when the due attention was paid, it did a great disservice to the cause of women rights by explaining the cause of declining female WPR through the lens of economic prosperity i.e. income effect. The evidence from Census (2001-11) and NSS (1999-2000 & 2011-12) do not conform to this general logic as the increase in income also leads to increase in consumption in early stage of increment in income. So, it is unlikely that women from the poorest households will withdraw from the workforce. However, this has been the case which pushes one to look for the additional explanations for withdrawal of female workforce from labour market. The analysis of evidence from NSS and Census of India, confirms that though, there has been rise in proportion of young females (5-24 age group) attending education institutes but the women who have withdrawn from work are actively seeking work while performing domestic duties along with allied activities. This means that the income effect do induce the greater school attendance but does an injustice to core women workforce (25-59) by reducing the logic behind the decline in female WPR to income while completely ignoring the socio-economic scenario and its regional patterns of patriarchy. This positivist and reductionist approach must be countered to bring the focus on the better quality work for women.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46700/asssr/2021/v3/i1/209833

PDF
XML

References

1. Abraham, V. 2009. “Employment Growth in Rural India: Distress-Driven.” Economic and Political Weekly, 44, no. 16, pp. 97-104.

2. Abraham, V. 2013. “Missing Labour or Consistent “De-Feminisation”?” Economic and Political Weekly, 48, no. 31, pp. 99–108.

3. Chadha, G. K. & Sahu, P. P. 2002. “Post-Reform Setbacks in Rural Employment.” Economic & Political Weekly, 37, no. 21, pp. 1998–2026.

4. Chatterjee, U. Murgai, R. and Rama, M. 2015. “Job Opportunities Along the Rural-Urban Gradation and Female Labour Force Participation in India.” Published by World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7412.

5. Chowdhury, S. 2011. “Employment in India: What Does the Latest Data Show?” Economic and Political Weekly, 46, no. 32, pp. 23-26.

6. Deshpande, S. and Deshpande, L. K. 1992 “New Economic Policy and Female Employment.” Economic and Political Weekly, 27, no. 41, pp 2248-2252.

7. Deshpande, S. and Deshpande, L. 1998 “Impact of Liberalization on Labour Market in India: What Do Facts from NSSO's 50th Round Show?” Economic and Political Weekly, 33, no. 22, pp. L31-L39.

8. Himanshu. 2011. “Employment Trends in India: A Re-examination.” Economic and Political Weekly, 46, no. 37, pp. 43–59.

9. Hirway, I. 2012. “Missing Labour Force: An Explanation.” Economic and Political Weekly, 47, no. 37, 99. 67 –72.

10. Kannan, K. P., & Raveendran, G. 2012. “Counting and Profiling the Missing Labour Force.” Economic and Political Weekly, 47, no. 6, pp. 77–80.

11. Lahoti, R. and Swaminathan, H. 2016. “Economic Development and Women’s Labor Force Participation in India.” Feminist Economics, 22, no. 2, pp. 168-195.

12. Mathew, S. S. 2012. “Distress-Driven Employment and Feminisation of Work in Kasargod District, Kerala.” Economic and Political Weekly, 47, no. 26/27, pp. 65–73.

13. Mehrotra, S., Parida, J. K. and Gandhi, A. “Explaining Employment Trends in Indian Economy: 1993-94 to 2011-12.” Economic and Political Weekly, 49, no. 32 (2014): 49-57.

14. Neff, D., Sen, K., & Kling, V. 2012. “The Puzzling Decline in Rural Women’s Labor Force Participation in India: A Reexamination.” Working paper, GIGA, Germany.

15. Symes, D. 1991. “Changing Gender Roles in Productionist and Post Productionist Capitalist Agriculture.” Journal of Rural Studies, 7, no. 1/2, pp. 85-90.

16. Verpa, S. S. 2005. “Feminisation of Agriculture and Marginalisation of Their Economic Stake.” Economic and Political Weekly, 40, no. 25, pp. 2563-2568.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 JASSSR

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.