Abstract
The introduction of the Citizenship Amendment Act 2019, led to nationwide protests and mass mobilisation of minority women. The sit-in protests conducted at Shaheen Bagh Delhi from December 2019 to March 2020 was one such mobilisation that garnered public attention. The protests at Shaheen Bagh, Delhi continued till the pandemic forced the protestors to leave the site. This paper examines the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act 2019, through the identity and gender perspective. The gathering of women protestors raised questions about their fundamental rights and discrimination from the provision made under the Citizenship Amendment Act 2019. The protests used national symbols, songs, slogans, paintings on the wall and poetry as means to resist the idea of amendment as proposed by the establishment. To understand the resistance against the proposed CAA, it is necessary to look at the presence of minority women and their mobilisation to assert their identities as individuals and as a group. In a pluralistic society like India, people from different backgrounds enhance the geographical and cultural nuances and increase social cohesion in the country. The Citizenship Amendment Act 2019, discriminates against minority sections in India and is further prejudiced against women. The awareness of losing one’s fundamental right led to the protests to seek their identity and ensure a safe physical space in a multicultural society. While there is a lot of research on the identities of refugees and international migrants, internal diversity is unique to very few places, and the ramifications of this unique feature are an interesting phenomenon to observe. The resistance led by minority women in Shaheen Bagh, Delhi, garnered huge people’s support and reflects social cohesion in a diverse society like India. The resistance and social mobilization at Shaheen Bagh, Delhi, was a unique protest as it portrayed the emotions and effervescence of unrest through songs, slogans, and speeches at the sit-in protests that influenced the masses, and their public opinion. The methodology used will be an exploratory study of select media reportage of the Shaheen Bagh protest from December 2019 to March 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46700/asssr/2024/v6/i2/2024120602009
References
1. Alexander, JC, and Smith, P. The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
2. Ashesh, A., and Thiruvengadam, A. "Report on Citizenship Law: India." Global Citizenship Observatory (GLOBAL CITY), Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, and Edinburgh University Law School, 2017. https://publications.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/168/1/Report%20on%20citizenship% 20law_India.pdf.
3. Banerjee, P., et al., eds. REFUGEE WATCH. 53 (2019). A South Asian Journal on Forced Migration. http://www.mcrg.ac.in/rw%20files/RW53/RW53.pdf#page=42.
4. Bhat, RA, and Deshpande, A. "BEYOND BORDERS: UNDERSTANDING THE SOCIETAL AND POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS OF MIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION IN INDIA." Glocalism Journal of Culture Politics and Innovation [2024]. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/glocalism/article/view/22346.
5. Buchanan, I. Deleuze and the Contemporary World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
6. Dasgupta, U. "Chilli Powder and Resistance: Mirch Masala, Shaheen Bagh, and the Politics of Space."
7. Faisal, SM. "Shaheen Bagh and the Hermeneutics of Muslim Identity in South Asia." HAU 10 (2020): 767. https://doi.org/10.1086/712221.
8. "Feminist Dissent: Citizen, Citizenship and Shaheen Bagh." https://doi.org/10.31273/fd.n5.2020.768.
9. Foucault, M. Subjectivity and Truth: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1980-1981. Springer, 2017.
10. Goodwin, J., and Jasper, JM. The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
11. Guru, G., ed. "Employment Insecurities in the Service Sector." Economic and Political Weekly LV (2020): 511-31. https://apps.aima.in/aima_libary/Economic-and-political-issues/June%206%20511_EPW_Vol_LV_No23.pdf#page=31.
12. Jain, D. "Understanding Leadership: Lessons from the Women’s Movement." India International Centre Quarterly 39, no. 3/4 (2020): 1-12.
13. Lahiri, S. "Enhancing Visibility, Extending Solidarity: Women's Participation in the 2020-2021 Farmer Protests."
14. "Locating Gramsci in Shaheen Bagh: Perspectives on the Iconic Protests." Capital and Class, 1-7.
15. Mains, D. "Blackouts and Progress: Privatization, Infrastructure, and a Developmentalist State in Jimma, Ethiopia." Cultural Anthropology 27, no. 3 (2012): 407-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01124.x.
16. Ong, A. "Mutations in Citizenship." Theory, Culture & Society 23, no. 6 (2006): 499-
17. 505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406064831.
18. Roy, DS. "Locating Gramsci in Shaheen Bagh: Perspectives on the Iconic Protests."
19. Capital and Class, 1-7.
20. Rai, SM. "Feminist Dissent." Feminist Dissent 5 (2021): 265. https://doi.org/10.31273/fd.n5.2020.768.
21. Sen, S. "Toward a Feminist Politics? The Indian Women’s Movement in Historical Perspective." Working Paper Series No. 9, The World Bank Development Research Group/Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, 2000.
22. Ståhlberg, P. "Benedict Anderson (1983) Imagined Communities." Routledge eBooks, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432272-21.
23. Shaheen Bagh: A Graphic Recollection. Edited by Mehrotra & Jamil. Yoda Press, 2021.
24. Seema, M., ed. Shaheen Bagh and the Idea of India: Writings on a Movement for Justice, Liberty, and Equality. Speaking Tiger Books, 2020. 47-48.
25. Taylor, D. Michel Foucault: Key Concepts. Routledge, 2011.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 JASSSR
